Showing posts with label In it to win it. Show all posts
Showing posts with label In it to win it. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 19, 2014

12 Years a Slave (2013)

I feel like writing about the Best Picture nominees (that I've seen).

I don't think this movie could have been made by an American.

Or, I should say, I don't think this movie could have been properly made by an American.

It's an odd thing to say since I'm no big fan of Steve McQueen. His movies have left me cold in the past. There's a distance between creator and subject that prevents the audience from really feeling.

There's some of that here, too, and I worried early on as I watched the steamboat paddle-wheel spin (amidst some nagging The Master flashbacks) that this movie would be part and parcel with the rest. It's not. And while that's in large part due to Chiwetel Ejiofor, it's also down to Steve McQueen.

I almost can't believe I'm writing this, but . . . his subtlety and restraint do wonders here. An American director would revel in the viscera of every beating. He would flash chyrons on the screen with the passage of every year to make you feel the weight of them like bricks. He'd rub your nose in blood to make sure you really get how horrible slavery was.

McQueen, on the other hand, accomplishes the same task in a far more lyrical, ephemeral, and unsettling way. Years melt away without any understanding of where in the 12 you might be. It's made clear that Solomon is whipped daily under Epps (Michael Fassbender) for failing to pick the quota of 200 pounds of cotton, but you never see it up close. It's far off in a field, and you watch the other slaves react. You watch their lack of reaction.

Somehow, somehow, McQueen and screenwriter John Ridley and Ejifor turn it all around to make the movie not about the physical brutality of slavery but the heavy psychological cost. Benedict Cumberbatch does lovely work as a preacher whose heart rends at the thought of separating mother from child but still who prioritizes his pocketbook over the pricking of his conscience when Solomon reaches out. Solomon says over and over that he will not give into despair, and you watch him struggle to carry not only his own compassion but also to carry it for everyone else around him. They've given up trying, letting him stretch on a noose with his toes sliding in the mud for hours and hours.

The picture I chose comes from a scene that illustrates so exactly what I am talking about that it almost feels like a cheat to bring it up. You spend the entire time plastered to the back of your seat, breath caught in your chest, and just when it feels like the moment is finally going to let up, the camera pulls back to punch you in the gut. No American would have been able to go in for that shot without giving the game away first. No one but Steve McQueen could have pulled it off, I suspect.

A note about the viscera: if you're sensitive about that sort of thing, I don't want you to read what I wrote and think, "Oh, it's fine. I can handle that." There is viscera. When it comes, they really make it count.

But also, don't give up on this movie based on what you can handle. It's worth the weight.

Thursday, January 27, 2011

The Social Network (2010) and The King's Speech (2010)

© The Weinstein Company
There's talk in some parts that The Social Network's triumph over The King's Speech at the Golden Globes is some kind of referendum on the middlebrow melodrama. When I first started cooking up The Underrated List, "middlebrow melodrama" was my initial M. While I wouldn't go back and change my entry now, they -- specifically historical* ones -- hold a special place in my movie going heart.

That said, The Social Network is a better movie than The King's Speech. It's already gone through two backlashes (1. that it's not factual, which I addressed here; 2. that it's sexist, which I would argue is true of the characters but not the filmmakers) and continued apace, surely a noteworthy fact. But the thing that really sets The Social Network apart from The King's Speech is every element is brilliant.

It seems kind of unnecessary at this point to sing the praises of the movie, given the acclaim it's received since its October 1 release, but I'm going to anyway. Most of it should go to Jesse Eisenberg, who I had previously written off as Michael Cera-lite. Confidential to Jesse: I couldn't have been more wrong. I had no idea that you had the depth of character or the talent to play a sympathetic asshole. In your care, Mark Zuckerberg is borderline autistic in his inability to foresee the impact he has on those closest to him, but he's also a ruthless genius who's deeply, deeply sad. And, thanks to Aaron Sorkin, quite quippy.

© Columbia Pictures
Of course, it helps that he's drowning in talent, whether it's Andrew Garfield's Eduardo Saverin (the closest the movie comes to having a moral centre, he's presented as more short-sighted than anything else), Armie Hammer (whose ability to come play the the physically-imposing twins as separate and distinct is a sight to be cherished), and Justin Timberlake's Sean Parker. Up until I saw this movie, I had no real interest in JT, especially as an actor, but now . . . let me quote: "early Facebook President Sean Parker, devastatingly portrayed by Justin Timberlake as a narcissistic clown." That is so true!

Again, though the combination of noted internet hater Aaron Sorkin + David Fincher + Facebook sounds like a recipe for disaster, it's anything but. Fincher's dark Harvard hallways add verve to Sorkin's trademark snappy dialogue, and Trent Reznor's buzzy score elevates the movie to a place that feels raw and modern, edgy in the season of being on the edge of something. Bracing, even. I was going to say that Angus Wall and Kirk Baxter's editing is the only stuff that could give Inception a run for its money come Oscar time, but, since Inception wasn't even nominated (wtf?!), I guess I'll just keep that to myself.

So why does all that make The Social Network better than The King's Speech? Because TKS, for all it's fantastic performances, is nothing more than that: a collection of fantastic performances. Certainly, if Colin Firth doesn't win every award ever I am going to throw a fit, but after that . . . there's nothing spectacular about Tom Hooper's direction or David Seidler's script and, the less said about Alexandre Desplat's score, the better. The Social Network, A; The King's Speech, B+.

*Confession: As I just learned what period piece means last week, I intentionally did not use it here. Turns out that term is reserved for pieces that were written during the period in which they are set. Did you realize that? I thought it was just an alliterative way to call something historical.

Monday, February 08, 2010

In the Loop (2009)

In the Loop is only nominated for Best Adapted Screenplay, although why it isn't nominated for just about everything is beyond me. Is there an award for most inventive cussing?*

Based on TV series The Thick of It, co-writer and director Armando Iannucci has created a pitch-black satire that's almost certainly a hair's breadth away from being exactly right, which is what makes it so scary and funny to watch. The (never-seen) US President and the UK Prime Minister fancy themselves a war in the Middle East, but not everyone in their respective governments agrees. A single off-message word dropped in a radio interview by International Development Minister Simon Foster (Tom Hollander) is all it takes to kick the ramp up to international conflict into high gear. He's equally beset by political factions for and against the war, but it's the Prime Minister's own director of communications, Malcolm Tucker (Peter Capaldi), who wields the most dangerous weapons: words and influence.

It's like The West Wing in reverse: instead of an idealistic group of people who want to change the world for the better united under a passionate, intelligent leader, a disparate group from both sides of the pond are too obsessed with their own careers and machinations to see clearly through the conflict they're helping create even as they try to negate it. In the middle of it all, there's a man so adept with one-liners and profanity that to add in his drive makes him look positively Shakespearean (if Shakespeare's characters said things like, "I've already told you to fuck off twice, and yet you're still here").

It's genuinely unsettling to realize that people no one elected can effect such catastrophic policy (and so quickly), so Iannucci et al. have the good sense to make it so funny that you keep from losing your head. Packed to the gills with recognizable faces and brilliant supporting work, the docu-verité shooting style and editing only heighten the feeling that what you are watching could be a dramatic recreation of the truth. Finally, Dr. Strangelove has found its true heir. A-

*Actually, if there were, In the Loop would have some stiff competition from Fantastic Mr. Fox.

Friday, July 24, 2009

Pop Culture Round Up: July 11 - 24

Ryan Reynolds lands Green Lantern role

Writing Pictures: Ann Hornaday on the Art of the Hollywood Screenplay

As Music Mags Fall, Pitchfork Is Booming

Andrew Sarris - A Survivor of Film Criticism’s Heroic Age

Daniel Radcliffe Aces Interview With Terrified 11-Year-Old Reporter

Tate perfects the modern art of living dangerously

Female Directors, Still A Scarce Movie Commodity

Chace Crawford Moves Out of Ed Westwick's Apartment

... | The New York Observer

Leonard Cohen's heard enough of Hallelujah

Third 'Bridget Jones' in works

Austen in sea monster mash-up

Emmy Nominations Announced!

Artistic tendencies linked to 'schizophrenia gene'

The privileged Westerner’s guide to talking about the rest of the world

Valery Gergiev: The Ring master

Report says doom and gloom of movie biz means make more movies!

Former CBS anchor Walter Cronkite dies

The Tyranny of Choice

Jane Austen tames Tombstone

True Blood's Christian Conservative Vampire-Hater Speaks Out

Target’s Book Club Can Make Sleepy Titles Into Best Sellers

Sam Raimi plays 'Warcraft'

Researchers Train Minds to Move Matter

The end of the affair: five of the best breakup movies

Singer gets his revenge on United Airlines and soars to fame

Twilight 2 Soundtrack to Feature Non-Belchy Thom Yorke Track

Jeffrey Wells Is on Team Edward

Today’s Swooniest Brit Actors

Saturday, February 21, 2009

Oscar Round Up (2009)

Let's do this thing. View full list of nominees.

Performance by an actress in a supporting role

Amy Adams in Doubt
Penélope Cruz in Vicky Cristina Barcelona
Viola Davis in Doubt
Taraji P. Henson in The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
Marisa Tomei in The Wrestler

I didn't mention Henson at all in my review of Button or say much about Tomei in The Wrestler. It's not that either of them don't deserve consideration. They are both great in their respective roles (though it's hard to pick out exactly what's meant to be so extraordinary about Henson's work. Tomei manages to imbue the old stripper with a heart of gold trope with an earthiness that grounds the character). I mention these things because I don't think either one is going to win. Instead, that'll go to . . .

Who will win: Cruz. Which is fine by me, as she is by far the spark that makes the movie come alive.
Who should win: From the list, Davis. She gets more across in her ten minutes of screen time than most other actors can in an entire movie. I hope she wears something fantastic tomorrow night. Going outside the list, Debra Winger and Rosemarie Dewitt for Rachel Getting Married.

Performance by an actress in a leading role

Anne Hathaway in Rachel Getting Married
Angelina Jolie in Changeling
Melissa Leo in Frozen River
Meryl Streep in Doubt
Kate Winslet in The Reader

Do you think Streep ever saw Hathaway as competition when they were making The Devil Wears Prada? While I doubt that Streep thinks that way, I doubt she would have if she did. While it's great to see something as small as Frozen River up there and a great character actress like Leo on the list, that's as far as she'll get. Jolie's nod feels like par for the course, and, though Hathaway deserves it for shedding her lingering Princess Dairies shimmer and bringing something truly revelatory to the screen, she's not really much of a contender. It's a Streep-Winslet grudge match.

Who will win: Winslet.
Who should win: Hathaway.

Performance by an actor in a supporting role

Josh Brolin in Milk
Robert Downey Jr. in Tropic Thunder
Philip Seymour Hoffman in Doubt
Heath Ledger in The Dark Knight
Michael Shannon in Revolutionary Road

Since this category's been a foregone conclusion for months, let's take a moment to note how unimaginative it is. Downey, sure, but why not go whole hog and put Cruise up there? Ledger, yes, but let's not forget about Eckhart. Harvey Dent made that movie. What about a little something for Michael Sheen? Brolin deserves it for waking up a couple of years ago and deciding to knock every one's socks off, and Shannon deserves it most of all for breathing such life into the holy fool trope that the role became that movie's lightening rod.

Who will win: Ledger.
Who should win: Ledger. That's right. If that's the list you're going to give me, that's how I vote. It's a stunning performance, and those who suggest otherwise is just looking to be contrary.

Performance by an actor in a leading role

Richard Jenkins in The Visitor
Frank Langella in Frost/Nixon
Sean Penn in Milk
Brad Pitt in The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
Mickey Rourke in The Wrestler

Much like Leo on the leading lady list, it's nice to see some recognition for a consummate character actor like Jenkins. He won't win, but it'll be great to see him there. Langella should have won last year for Starting out in the Evening, and I doubt the Academy is going to rectify that this year. Same goes for Pitt's work in The Assassination of Jesse James. Which leaves us with showdown between Penn, playing a truly likable character that he refuses to allow to slip into caricature, and Rourke, whose crazy Oscar campaign only underlines want an amazing feat his raw performance truly was. This is the closest race of the bunch.

Who will win: Rourke.
Who should win: Rourke. Why not? Also, Robert Downey Jr for Iron Man, Christian Bale for The Dark Knight, François Bégaudeau for Entre les murs . . .

Achievement in Directing and Best Motion Picture of the Year

We've got five for five this year, and, as I have said in the past, it's hard to talk about one and not the other.

The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, David Fincher
Frost/Nixon, Ron Howard
Milk, Gus Van Sant
The Reader, Stephen Daldry
Slumdog Millionaire, Danny Boyle

I've seen and reviewed all these movies, so I'm just going to call it.

Who will win: Boyle, Slumdog Millionaire
Who should win: Boyle, Slumdog Millionaire. Neither it nor him fit the "little indie that could" bill that has been applied during its campaign, but it's the best of the bunch. I sincerely hope that Anthony Dod Mantle wins for cinematography as well. Love that man. This year, I think that means something. The only upset I can see is in favour of the Van Sant/Milk combo.

I'll tell you what, though. I will laugh and laugh if I get this all wrong.

Friday, February 13, 2009

Pop Culture Round Up: February 7-13

BAFTA winners.

WGA winners.

Criticism in crisis: why review?

Sad. Peel her a grape, angels.

Yeah, we were written before, people. Totally not cashing in.

I wouldn't normally link to a list like this, but some of my favourites are on it.

Tell 'em, Emma!

Ah, Dana. That closing paragraph is why I love you.

What the hell? How have I been missing this?

Six? Did we see the same movie?

"One year later, the evidence is clear: The WGA strike crippled the film and TV biz."

Aw.

Orchestras inspired by Soloist to do good deeds. Aww.

I find that his friend at the screening does a better job of explicating why The Reader shouldn't win than Ron Rosenbaum does for the majority of the article though I agree that the character lacks any real show of remorse.

Important question.

Isn't the book not due out until April, though? At any rate, they should hire me. I would rock that shit.

That would be a difficult list to create.

Whoa. I can't even imagine.

Does anyone just feel 'meh' about him at this point? Also, the topic seems a little uninspired. Wouldn't something about rounding up certain key players in the Iraq war for war crimes be a more exciting, left-wing topic?

Here's two ideas you don't see together every day: William Shatner ballet.

All these new ideas are . . . not worrying, exactly. Questionable. Yes, I have questions. How will I know who designed the dress unless some interchangeable E! host asks the starlet?

All of this just really makes me love her more. Please, please write a tell all. I would pre-order that mother.

Woman after my own heart.

I don't usually make a point of linking to these things as I would end up linking to them every freakin' week, but I found this one in particular to vibrate with a love of film. I find that Scott Tobias gets that way when he writes about Soderbergh, and it makes me wish he would write a book about him.

Aw, don't blame yourself, James. Either he's crazy or he's an idiot, but you're not responsible for either. You are a wonderful director.

Friday, February 06, 2009

Pop Culture Round Up: January 31 - February 6

DGA winners.

I don't know why exactly but heh.

"The nominations of a still relatively little-seen crop of best-picture contenders are making it harder for producers of the Oscar ceremony to deliver on an earlier promise: to create a big night for the movies, even if some of the movies are not so big." You know, I never used to think one way or the other about whether the movies nominated were seen or unseen, but she does have a point. What makes you tune in if the only movie if you are likely to have seen is Wall-E? You already know and like Wall-E. You don't need the Academy to tell you that.

Also, heh. I'm buying a Group of Seven work when my ship comes in just to be contrary. Or maybe I'll get cute Geoffrey Farmer to do an installation. I suppose that would be selling out, though, so maybe that wouldn't work. Good thing no actual ship is on the horizon with all these decisions to make.

This is true, and I can get behind it. I'd personally like it if we had shorter seasons but more seasons throughout the year.

This link pretty much exists for the last line. Could you imagine what mincemeat Don Draper (name must be said in full) would make of Edward? Edward could be his new Pete, actually, now that Pete seems to be on his way up (or dead, or down). I love that show.

And this one exists pretty much for the headline.

Oh, dear. This does not suggest good things for my future.

This dramatic thriller and its casting strike me as better suited to a comedy.

You'll never guess who Clint Eastwood's best partnership is with!

Really? That doesn't seem right.

"
Indeed, Disney said its CEO decided to forgo an additional bonus of $2.4 million as a gesture of good will." Generosity!

At first I balked, but I think I get this. It's cocktail party fodder.

Heh. Dude, you so don't get it.

"I don't have a message." That's good to know. Also, of course.

Alright, I don't want to spend a lot of time on the thing that you've been hearing and seeing all week, so you get this and this. But that's it.

Backlash to the backlash: "Some say the Oscar contender is 'poverty porn,' but that criticism misconstrues the nature of art."

Okay, I totally want this, especially if it a) contains insults about the source material or b) is secretly a tell-all. Would it be too much to hope for both?

Heh: my friend sent me a link to this for the headline.

I know this one! I know this one! Is the answer, "Yes, for pete's sake, kill it and put us all out of our misery?"

Ugh, why? I mean, I know why, but still.

This casting has blown my mind.

Friday, January 30, 2009

Pop Culture Round Up: January 24 - 30

Who, pray tell, is being mocked? Your career?

What the? I don't care if Jennifer Saunders is involved, this thing is fishy. When my friend introduced me to the show, she told me that it was about a pair of aging hippies and trying to be career women but still hippies. Plus they're alcoholics. Does America find functional alcoholics funny?

Criticism in crisis reactions: Oh, no! I'm lazy!

They hired a new critic? Insanity!

For every action . . .

And a criticism defense!

"Film critics and scholars have a tumultuous relationship with a system that is meant to help guide readers but may also encourage some to skip the review entirely."

"The intellectual author's copious diaries record her struggles with a domineering father, her stultifying stint in the court of George III, her controversial marriage to a Catholic escapee from the French Revolution." Saucy stuff!

Ooo, another door! A flood door, but still.

"The most brilliant thing to happen to Jane Austen’s novels since … well, ever." I must have this book.

Don Draper makes ice cream!

That's too bad.

What, what?! This just might be awesome.

Holy Moses. Mind you, if I had that actor in the role, I might be wary of including an certain predilection as well.

This hurts a little.

Yes! I have been saying this for years.

Hmm. Good question. I'm pretty sure awesome movie is still the answer.

Heh. Although what he says is, "You followin' me, camera guy?", which is even better.

"As the number of possessions grew, so did the concept of ‘taste’, a subtle and elusive yardstick by which people advertised their social position and sensibilities."

"
Comics actually are jazz." I can't say that occurred to me before.

I can't imagine one actor who could play him, much less two.

Hey, they did something nice!

Aww, don't take away old peoples' TVs!

SAG winners.

PGA winners.

Thursday, January 22, 2009

It can't be that bad, can it?

Dear Academy,

Was 2008 that bad a year for movies? I've suspected it was for a while, and your nominations this morning only confirm that theory. Little seems unexpected and a lot seems overlooked, which I suppose is your stock in trade, but c'mon. Fortunately I don't think you'll ever disappoint me quite as much as you did when you failed to recognize Children of Men as one of the single greatest movies ever, but let's talk about what you're doing here.

I've yet to see The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, but I doubt that it's 13 nominations good. David Fincher's last movie, Zodiac, was possibly that good, and you paid it no mind. Are you trying to make up for that?

It's nice to see character actors Richard Jenkins and Melissa Leo get a Q-rating boost from their respective nods, and it's nice for you to throw hardest working actor in Hollywood Robert Downey Jr. a bone.

Less nice are the lack of nominations for the following: The Dark Knight for best picture, Christopher Nolan for director, Jonathan and Christopher Nolan for screenplay; In Bruges for anything other than screenplay; acting nods for Slumdog Millionaire; Bruce Springsteen for song; Rosemaire Dewitt or Debra Winger for supporting actress, Jonathan Demme for director, Rachel Getting Married for best picture.

Much like the middling melodramas you've insisted on celebrating, your nominations feel less than inspired. Most people would tell me that you're like that every year. When is it going to stop?

Heart,

April

P.S. I am going to go hang out with Dana and Troy.

Friday, January 09, 2009

Pop Culture Round Up: December 20 - January 9

I'm still getting all caught up, you know?

Inglorious Basterds finally gets a release date.

Sort of to the side of Criticism in Crisis, but still good to know.

More Criticism in Crisis reactions.

"Normally, a picture is worth a thousand words. But during blurb season, the laws of nature are reversed." Which is why I head to the movies and see giant Rolling Stone reviews in the place of cardboard cutouts.

Yay, Lauren Graham on TV again!

Speaking of, this reminds me of that Gilmore Girls episode where the town loner wanted to hang a giant sign from the bell tower.

Heh. This list is so curmudgeonly.

What if the movie is the only way you are going to get to see it?

Gak! Brain pain!

Check the slide show.

Gah, this bugs. Won't they at least need him for the before scenes?

They certainly don't seem as inventive as they could be.

Wouldn't be against it!

Why is this news to me? Also, is it just me or does Pegg look particularly foxy in that photo?

Do NOT take this away from us, Judge.

More art to be returned.

Sad.

But scientists, Army, and Al Gore got in the way.

Yes, but are they ideal for a certain song by Spinal Tap?

Not the point: Possession is finally coming out? Dude, I wrote about that last February.

Also not the point: In answer to your last question, no, but maybe he should consider it.

Listen, while that is the best part of Fantasia, what the hell? Just . . . why? Maybe it will be cool. I have my doubts, but maybe.

How cute is the "why am I marrying him?" gallery? (Psst, you have to click on the left to get to it)

I misread this headline and thought one crazy movie was in store.

And in honour of my best friend's most recent birthday.

'Tis the season:

National Society of Film Critics Awards.

PGA nominations.

WGA nominations.

DGA nominations.

Nice of CBC to put all their top 10 lists in one place.

Dana Stevens' Top 10.

Stephanie Zacharek's Top 10.

Vulture's Critics' Poll Ballots and Results.

The best of the AV Club.

TWoP's most disappointing movies of the year, favourite movies of the year, and most hated movies.

MOVIE CLUB! Yes, I was yelling. I loves me some Movie Club.

Friday, December 19, 2008

Pop Culture Round Up: December 13 - 19

Zombie romances and rock'n'roll vampires? Sign me up!

Yay! Who's up for a road trip?

That just seems silly. If you're getting paid, what's the point?

I'm telling you, it follows me around! This one appeared in an email that I was legitimately forwarded at work. And someone sent me this one. Good points, though.

I remain dubious.

Excellent. I can think of a good number of movies that would be improved by drinking.

Gak
!

Could our criticism in crisis series be drawing to a close or is this an anomaly?

That makes sense.

Sure, if you live in the U.S.

Aw. Well, maybe. Nah, it's Rudd and Segel. Aw.

This is news?

I'd go to that.

Is that it? Really? Should I feel bad?

Sad.

'Tis the season:

The Guardian's most ridiculous plots.

There's always one.

Toronto Film Critics Association Awards.

AV Club's Year in Film. And their worst of the year. And a bonus crosstalk! I've missed crosstalks.

SAG nominees
.

Friday, December 12, 2008

Pop Culture Round Up: December 6 - 12

I don't rightly know what happened here this week. I had movies to review but didn't. I'll get them in sometime soon, I hope.

So long as shows are still canceled for poor ratings, yes.

I think the point is to draw a line between good natured ribbing and out-and-out teasing.

What the hell? Not only do I think Hardwicke deserves greater credit than the studio is willing to give (sounds like they want to get a sequel out so fast that they are willing to sacrifice any attempt at quality), but also do they really think this guy is going to do better? You know what? I think a woman is better suited to helm the franchise, and I find it sexist to kick one out and then call her irrational. Is there a petition I can sign?

Heh. There's just something so fabulous about Schnabel.

Download the PDF today!

Dude, I think, although those are some pretty hefty cons. Ah, who am I kidding. Someone get me a subscription for Christmas, won't you?

It's spreading. I think my earlier estimate of two years is a little on the short side, though.

I would go so crazy during the chat thing! I would forget to look up at the movie.

A) Why haven't I heard of this book before? B) Why don't I own it? C) Why hasn't anyone hired me to adapt it? I already have some great, Wizard of Oz inspired ideas.

What the crap is this? I want the one with the sweet bitchface, people.

The obsession continues: More stolen art returns.

Great because he is one of those actors that you want to break out in a big way.

This looks cool.

Generally, I use the term black list to refer to something bad, but this works, too.

Sad.

Would these things ever not work on me.

It's kind of hard not to love him. Besides, Speed is a really good movie.

I think this might be a good idea.

How nice!

Send some e-cards, then watch the puppets. I defy you not to laugh.

'Tis the season:

David Edelstein's 10 best surprised me.

Critics' Choice Award nominees.

Golden Globe nominations.

New York Film Critics Circle Awards.

Los Angeles Film Critics Awards.

Friday, December 05, 2008

Pop Culture Round Up: November 29 - December 5

I can't say I'd put many of these on my list if I took the time to make one, but I can tell you that there are some great ones in there like 48 and 15. They've even got the same quote I used last January in my Culture article!

Recently I was reminded of this glorious thing, which I stumbled upon years ago for legitimate work reasons. That job was terrible, but at least it had that.

Part of me thinks that this is terrible, and the part of me motivated by scheudenfraude hopes this blows up like David O. Russell did awhile back.

If I tried this challenge, I wouldn't need new reading material for a solid two years.

The more we learn from Anton Chigurh, the better.

The first person to get me one of these wins top prize. For reals.

This never would have happened on Slings & Arrows.

I'm a little concerned that this will be awful, but I'm going to try to hope for awesome. Or at least not sucky.

"Viva Las Vegas meets Tommy?" How have I not heard of this before?

Yay! Really yay!

Alex Kingston would be an excellent Doctor. Lobby hard!

"TIME TO SPARKLE" is my new sign off.

I was unconcerned with this rivalry this summer, but now I am jazzed about the re-release. I am going to go see it again.

Holy shit! You know who they should centre this around, don't you? Eric.

Feel free to read this if you want to bring yourself down.

Go to the source and read the entire thing if you need a laugh after the above link.

And, because it is that time again: Independent Spirit Award Nominees and National Board of Review Winners.

I know, I know you are sick of my weird love-loathe thing with Twilight, but I clicked on over to The Old Hag because I used to love it and now haven't been there in, like, for-EVAH, and what do I see? A Twilight review. I don't make a point of linking reviews, but, hey, I love what she's got to say, and I can't wait to read her linked article.

Saturday, February 23, 2008

Oscar Round Up (2008)

To review the rules, click the label and read the original Oscar Round Up post.

Forgotten who's nominated? Here's your hook up.

Last year I was once again stuck at a rate of 5/6, but I am learning to live with it. It's a good ratio if you think about it. This was, as it turns out, a spectacular year for movies, and it's even more exciting to see that a lot of deserving movies are up for Academy Awards this year. Let's move on to the predictions then, shall we?

Performance by an actor in a leading role

George Clooney in Michael Clayton
Daniel Day-Lewis in There Will Be Blood
Johnny Depp in Sweeney Todd The Demon Barber of Fleet Street
Tommy Lee Jones in In the Valley of Elah
Viggo Mortensen in Eastern Promises

This has got to be one of the saddest line ups I've seen in years. Not because the performances are poor. They're are each individually astonishing. It's sad that they all have to go up against each other at the same time knowing only one will win it, especially given that who will win is a virtual lock. It's a pity really. I'd like to see what, say, Mortensen or Depp would say given the opportunity.

Who will win: Day-Lewis.
Who should win: The far recesses of my brain just spat out Steven Buscemi for Interview, if you can imagine, although I'd add Glen Hansard for Once to that list. Choosing amidst the list, it would really have to go to Depp. He sings and slashes throats. What more does the Academy want from him?

Performance by an actor in a supporting role

Casey Affleck in The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford
Javier Bardem in No Country for Old Men
Philip Seymour Hoffman in Charlie Wilson’s War
Hal Holbrook in Into the Wild
Tom Wilkinson in Michael Clayton

My, how offensive this category is right off the bat. He's the fucking lead in that movie. His character's name is in the title for pete's sake! Again, this is a sad line up for the reasons stated above. If Holbrook picks up the statue, it will be one of those lifetime-achievement-in-disguise awards, to which I am historically not opposed. If any of them won, really, I don't think I could find a reason to argue. Even so, I'm going to go with . . .

Who will win: Bardem.
Who should win: Affleck, for lead actor. For reals.

Performance by an actress in a leading role

Cate Blanchett in Elizabeth: The Golden Age
Julie Christie in Away from Her
Marion Cotillard in La Vie en Rose
Laura Linney in The Savages
Ellen Page in Juno

Damn it, why did they have to go and make the men's categories so easy to call and the women's so tough? Let's drop Blanchett for her unappealing turn in an unappealing movie, and Linney for no other reason than the fact that is just seems so unlikely. That leaves us with Page (a relative newcomer, which Oscar has traditionally favoured in this category), Cotillard (a young French stunner), and Chirstie (stirring performance in a thoroughly depressing movie). Page is the odds on favourite, although I'd say that the real grudge match is between Cotillard and Christie. Tricky.

Who will win: Christie.
Who should win: Wei Tang for Lust, Caution, Emily Mortimer for Lars and the Real Girl, Markéta Irglová for Once.

Performance by an actress in a supporting role

Cate Blanchett in I’m Not There
Ruby Dee in American Gangster
Saoirse Ronan in Atonement
Amy Ryan in Gone Baby Gone
Tilda Swinton in Michael Clayton

Let's save ourselves some time and admit that it seems to be down to Blanchett and Dee. One of them didn't have a lot of screentime but has a lifetime of work worth rewarding (à la Holbrook) and the other was a knockout in the midst of several deserving performances. She's the very centre of a movie that would seem to have no centre without her. Plus the Academy has a crush on her in a big way. Even so . . .

Who will win: Dee (?). This one's gonna be close. I wish we could see the numbers on it after the envelope is opened.
Who should win: Blanchett. Who am I to deny it?

Achievement in directing / Best motion picture of the year

Directing:

The Diving Bell and the Butterfly, Julian Schnabel
Juno, Jason Reitman
Michael Clayton, Tony Gilroy
No Country for Old Men, Joel Coen and Ethan Coen
There Will Be Blood, Paul Thomas Anderson


Picture:
Atonement
Juno
Michael Clayton
No Country for Old Men
There Will Be Blood

There's no better way to handicap one than to invoke the other. A given movie won't necessarily bring home the pair, but it will almost never bring home the big one without at least a director nod.

That said, we can eliminate . . . Atonement. Aw, crap. I didn't think Atonement would win in the first place. Now I am going to have to think about this. Clayton was smart and twisty, and, while everyone likes it, no one seems to love it. If Juno goes home with the prize, it would be the result of No Country and Blood splitting the dark, decaying America vote. I hope it doesn't. Both of the last two films are masterworks bound to resonate for years to come. I may have given them different grades, but I'm not sure one truly is better than the other. They're both outstanding examples of why filmmaking can be vital. They are both nominated for picture, director, and adapted screenplay. It's simply a question of whether there will be a sweep or whether someone will be going home with a consolation prize.

Who will win: Schnabel / No Country for Old Men.
Who should win: I'd be more than pleased to see either of the last two take Oscar home in both cases. Otherwise, stay tuned next week for my Top 10 of 2007.

What a fantastic year for film. I could be wrong about many of these. They're all so hard to call, and I love the Academy for getting that much right. Let's see what fun Jon has in for us come Sunday night.